Грушевськіана на сторінках часопису «Визвольний шлях» (1948–1991)

This study analyzes Hrushevskyi’s works and materials published in the journal «Liberation Path». The research focuses on the period from the journal’s launch in London in 1948 to Ukraineʼs declaration of independence in 1991. Hrushevskyi studies publications on the pages of this journal are classified on the basis of a combination of problem-thematic and genre approaches and systematized into the following groups: 1) articles of historiographical and theoretical-conceptual content; 2) publications about the historian's political views and activities; 3) reviews of pear studies; 4) memories of certain moments of the scientist's activity. The characteristics of the scientific heritage of Mykhailo Hrushevskyi are represented by several articles, among which the most notable are the publications of Bohdan Budurovych on the assessment by Western European and American historians of the scientific heritage of the outstanding Ukrainian historian and Mykola Chyrovskyi regarding the characteristics of M. Hrushevskyi as a researcher of economic aspects of the history of Ukraine. Less valuable from a scientific point of view were the works of Panteleimon Kovaliv and Bohdan Korchmarik. The publications about M. Hrushevskyi’s political views and activities mainly contained negative, politicized assessments, which were especially sharply manifested in Mykhailo Mukhin's article, in which there was not even an attempt to objectively characterize the political visions and activities of the leader of the Ukrainian national-political movement of the beginning 20th  century It was found that at the end of the 1980s, the journal increasingly focused on the views of the head of the Ukrainian Central Council as ideological components in the struggle for an independent Ukrainian state, and this indicates certain transformations of the traditionally conservative interpretations of the magazine’s authors. The third group of works on Grushevo in the magazine «Liberation Path» includes only two small reviews by Volodymyr Zhyla and Severyn Sokol in the studio about the outstanding historian. This study highlights the source-scientific potential of Yevhen Konovalets’ and Nestor Korol’s memoirs, which recount the events of the Ukrainian National Democratic Revolution of 1917–1921. These memoirs also include descriptions of selected episodes from M. Hrushevskyi’s activities, offering valuable insights into the period.