Словотвірна продуктивність родового відмінка однини: реалізація в геортонімії, специфіка деривації

The article is devoted to the semantic-grammatical features of the heortonyms motivation by hagionyms in the form of the genitive singular. Such derivation is not only a name transfer based on the metonymy: a saint person → a holiday in his honor. Semantic, morphological and syntactic changes during the lexicalization of a non-initial creative form most accurately reflect the lexical-morphological method mentioned in the works of I. Kovalyk, or the working term of this article semantic-grammatical derivation. Depending on the style, two types of nouns governing the genitive of hagionym can be reduced in the syntactic structure: pre-onymal appellatives (день, свято) and core components of compound official church names of holidays (Собор, Пам’ять). An important prerequisite for the transonomatization of the genitive of the hagionym is its use in the function of an inconsistent attribute with another noun. Next, the phrase is transformed into a grammatical form. The illustration of this phenomenon can generally be divided into two groups:

1. All possible syntactically distinguishable cases expressed by the controlled morphological form of the genitive singular of the creative uncoordinated attribute without a marked appellative. Such a morphological-syntactic dichotomy can be considered as the result of contamination of two different forms - the omitted appellative and the creative hagionym. It explains the possible inconsistency of the flexion of the heortonym with the preposition that originally referred to the appellative (accusative ← acc. + gen., nominative ← nom. + gen.): На Іллі (acc.) новий хліб на столі. Іллі (nom.) – громове свято.

2. Forms that have secondarily acquired the paradigm of the creative base - the names of the saint person in whose honor the holiday was named. This variant of declension is obviously connected with reverse semantic transfer as a result of secondary metonymy or personification of the name of the holiday; with the predominance of the syntactic component in the grammatical meaning of the case, in particular the case of the reduced form of the appellative, which governed the dependent genitive; with rhyme: Зажинають саме на Іллю. Як прийде Ілля, то наробить у полі гнилля.

Both the atypical initial form of the derivative, and the original case system, not identical with the paradigm of the creative base, are connected with the motivation of the analyzed holiday names by a non-initial morphological form. It is with such derivation that the genitive singular shows a high word-forming potential in heortonymy.

morphological form, genitive singular, creative base, semantic-grammatical method, transonomatization, transposition, heortonym, hagionym.